Skip to main content
Back to Main Project

SSD Modifications

Assessment

Modification 20 - Subdivision of Town Centre and Substages 13-16

Cessnock City, Singleton Shire

Current Status: Assessment

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. Prepare Mod Report
  2. Exhibition
  3. Collate Submissions
  4. Response to Submissions
  5. Assessment
  6. Recommendation
  7. Determination

Lot layout amendments and subdivision of Town Centre Stages 1-5 and Substages 13-16 resulting in 300+ additional allotments. Includes road roads, amendments to conditions, the relocation of an urban square and a small increase to public open space.

Attachments & Resources

Notice of Exhibition (1)

Notice of Exhibition_06042022_084719

Modification Application (14)

2210737_HuntleeMod20_RevC
E - Stormwater Flood Management Strategy
G - Street Tree Masterplan
D - Bushfire Statement
F - Pedestrian and Cycleway Masterplan
A - MOD20 - CONSTRAINTS ON AMENDED LOTS (3)
A - MOD20 - ROAD HIERARCHY (4)
A - MOD20 - CHANGES FROM MOD16 R0 (3)
A - MOD 20 - BASE PLAN (3)
A - MOD20 - PUBLIC EMBELLISHMENTS (4)
A - MOD20 - LOT COUNTS (4)
B - Traffic Statement
C - Ecology 7 Part Test
H - Town Centre Street Typologies

Response to Submissions (6)

Request RTS_04052022_024638
Attachment D - Civil Engineering Plans
Attachment B - Traffic Response
Attachment A - Figure 14[A]
2210737_Mod20_RTS_RevA3
Attachment C - Ausgrid

Agency Advice (13)

Pre Approval message
TfNSW Response
TfNSW Response-MP10_0137-Mod-20
Huntlee - Stage 1 Development - Response Letter
Huntlee New Town Stage 1 - MOD 20
Hunter Water Submission
BCD Letter - Huntlee MOD 20
SSD - Modification 10
Huntlee MOD20 _ Cessnock City Council Comment
RFS Advice MP10 0137 Mod 20 Huntlee
TfNSW Response
TfNSW Submission
Huntlee Town Centre_MP10_0137 Mod 20

Additional Information (13)

Request for Additional Information_26072022_095639
Huntlee Mod 20 - SIDRA modelling review
Request for Additional Information_03082022_094438
Request for Additional Information_19092022_020444
MOD20 R4 - CONSTRAINTS ON AMENDED LOTS (4)
MOD20 R4 - ROAD HIERARCHY (5)
MOD20 R4 - CHANGES FROM MOD16 R0 (4)
MOD20 - BASE PLAN (4)
Mod 20 RFS RFI Response
MOD20 R4 - PUBLIC EMBELLISHMENTS (5)
Mod 20 RFI 3 Response
MOD20 R4 - LOT COUNTS (5)
2210737_Mod20_RFI2_RevA1

Submissions

Filters
Showing 1 - 7 of 7 submissions
Singleton Council
Support
,
Message
Attachments
CESSNOCK CITY COUNCIL
Comment
CESSNOCK , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Mark McDougall
Object
Nelson Bay , New South Wales
Message
Hi Chris,

Further to previous correspondence I provide additional concerns regarding the subject modification application, summarised as follows;

• No information provided on how the existing water, electricity and communication services to Lot 34 DP755211 will be maintained.
• No information on how Lot 34 will have access to public roads for future development and future access to HWC, Energy Australia and NBN services. The public road connectivity to Lot 34 will affect the ability of the relevant service Authorities to provide the necessary services for future subdivision of Lot 34.
• The public road connectivity will affect the ability of HWC to provide sewer infrastructure from North Rothbury to the Branxton
Treatment works.
• No specific details on connectivity of North Rothbury to the Huntlee stage 14/15 Road network for future extension of water and/or sewer mains to Lot 34 DP755211. The construction of substantial retaining walls essentially blocking connectivity is apparent along the southern boundary of Lot 34 DP 755211. Require details of any proposed retaining walls along the boundary with Lot 34 and with existing North Rothbury.
• Further clarification on the timing for the construction of the extension of Rothbury Street.
• The connectivity of North Rothbury is dependent on the construction of stage 15 and Rothbury Street. Further clarification on the timing for the construction of the extension of Rothbury Street. Huntlee could delay the last stage and never have to connect the subdivision streets to North Rothbury.
• The public road connectivity will affect the ability of HWC to provide sewer infrastructure from North Rothbury to the Branxton
Treatment works. CCC Huntlee DCP is not consistent with the proposed modification master plan. How will road connectivity be maintained for the future development of Lot 34?
• The construction of substantial retaining walls essentially blocking connectivity is apparent along the southern boundary of Lot 34 DP 755211. Require details of any proposed retaining walls along the boundary with Lot 34 and with existing North Rothbury.
• No specific details on connectivity of North Rothbury to the Huntlee stage 14/15 Road network for future extension of water and/or
sewer mains to Lot 34 DP755211.
• The drainage from Stage 1 is not compliant with the approved Worley Parsons drainage system (as attached). The 1% AEP flood event should not pond against the Triton Boulevard boundary of Lot 34.
• The proposed non connectivity of Stage 1 reduces the ability for roads to convey the overland flows and the piped minor storm
events to the drainage channel.
• Insufficient details on the online detention basins 1 and 2.
• Insufficient details on the overflows across Lot 34 for the current approval and proposed by Mod 20.

I am happy to further expand on the above dot points. Should you consider this necessary please advise me at your earliest convenience. Best regards....
Mark

Mark J. McDougall Registered Surveyor/Director B.surv (UNSW) MIS NSW JP
Attachments
Steven Broussos
Support
GREENACRE , New South Wales
Message
There needs to be public toilets and parking
Name Withheld
Comment
Name Withheld
Object
DODGES FERRY , Tasmania
Message
Is there a policy of notifying neighbours, particularly those surrounded by the development?
Attachments
Callum Thomas
Object
NORTH ROTHBURY , New South Wales
Message
I object to the proposed modifications related to substages 14 and 15. I believe that the addition of 169 new residential lots will have a significant negative impact on the traffic volume and road conditions of North Rothbury. I also believe that it will be detrimental to North Rothbury's small village "personality" and further erode the surrounding natural environment (i.e. the further destruction of local flora and fauna around North Rothbury's border). I propose that the modifications to substages 14 and 15 be rejected on these grounds, or be amended to include a significant natural barrier between the substages and North Rothbury.

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
MP10_0137-Mod-20
Main Project
MP10_0137
Assessment Type
SSD Modifications
Development Type
Residential & Commercial
Local Government Areas
Cessnock City, Singleton Shire

Contact Planner

Name
Chris Eldred