Skip to main content

State Significant Development

Response to Submissions

Dinawan Solar Farm

Murrumbidgee

Current Status: Response to Submissions & Prepare Amendment Report

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare EIS
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

Development of a 800 MW solar farm, associated infrastructure and battery storage.

EPBC

This project is a controlled action under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and will be assessed under the bilateral agreement between the NSW and Commonwealth Governments, or an accredited assessment process. For more information, refer to the Australian Government's website.

Attachments & Resources

Request for SEARs (2)

SEARs (14)

EIS (15)

Exhibition (1)

Response to Submissions (1)

Agency Advice (12)

Submissions

Filters
Showing 21 - 40 of 82 submissions
Name Withheld
Object
COONABARABRAN , New South Wales
Message
i object to this project. solar power is unreliable and not a suitable source of energy to power NSW. why are rural communities being destroyed in order to power NSW? rural communities did not ask for this, so we should not have to accommodate such projects. this will also have ugly consequences on the landscape.
Name Withheld
Object
Mendooran , New South Wales
Message
Why are renewable energy projects being dumped on rural landscapes? Why are rural communities left to fend for themselves as a result of bad governance and poor decision making? I object to this project because I do not believe that Dinawan should house a solar farm. Not only is this a ghastly and permanent sight on the landscapes, but this would be a disaster when it catches alight due to fire. The toxic implications as a result of this would be of such a significant level and not only the community, but the wildlife will suffer as a result.
Name Withheld
Object
Mendooran , New South Wales
Message
I object to this project.
This solar farm project will destroy a small rural community. The toxic run-off from such infrastructure associated with solar factory farms will be detrimental to nearby properties and wildlife.
Name Withheld
Object
MAXWELL , New South Wales
Message
This solar factory needs to be stopped it’s not in the correct area and wreaking farm land
John Angelico
Object
NARRE WARREN SOU , Victoria
Message
I believe the project is exceedingly inefficient, wasteful of good agricultural land and unlikely to ever fulfill its business objective without significant government subsidy.
This means that consumers will pay more for electricity generated by this solar "farm", taxpayers like me will have to pay more to fund federal subsidies, or both.
John McBratney
Object
Lancefield , Victoria
Message
I object strongly to this project on the unassailable solid engineering based ground that solar and wind generation cannot under any circumstances provide steady reliable power to a power grid. The inherent capacity factor averages around 30% and there is no known or potential generation technology anywhere in the world that can provide adequate fill-in generation for solar and wind systems, except coal, gas or nuclear based systems. Accordingly these system should not be built at huge expense to the public purse followed by vast ecological destruction during building and subsequently when these systems fail and hardware has to be disposed of.


Secondly I object strongly to these systems based upon the fact that they rely on mining by child slave labour in under-developed countries.
Australia should NOT support such reprehensible actions.
Stan Moore
Object
GUNDARY , New South Wales
Message
The EIS states

"There will be minimal waste generated in the operational phase. It is anticipated that the volumes of construction and decommissioning waste may exceed the capacity of the waste management facilities within the Murrumbidgee LGA. Concerns were raised during discussions with Murrumbidgee Council that the expected volumes are likely to exceed the capacity of local waste facilities and may require the waste to be managed through commercial agreements with contractors during construction of the project, a licensed waste management company and relevant local councils."

"Waste batteries Retired batteries used in operations appliances and equipment. Hazardous waste Collection by a contractor and disposed of to a suitably licensed facility."
"Electrical Damaged or faulty components. General Solid Waste (non-putrescible) Separated for reuse or recycling at an approved facility."

The volume of waste is not consistent with "clean energy" generation and is not acceptable and would not be acceptable by the majority of Australians if they knew about such levels of waste.
Further, damaged and faulty Electrical components should not be classified as General Solid Waste as it is E waste.
Name Withheld
Object
KOORINGAL , New South Wales
Message
I Object to Dinawan Solar Electricity Generating Works + BESS - SSD-50725959 because Industrialised Solar + BESS JUNK does not belong on irreplaceable Agricultural Land, is Toxic Contaminating, a Catastrophic Ticking Time Bomb - Toxic Fire/Smoke Hazard Risk, is Unethically Reliant on Torturous Slave Labour Supply Chains & is PATHETIC, INTERMITTENT, UNAFFORDABLE, IMAGINARY POWER WHICH ENSURES VULNERABLE PEOPLE WILL SUFFER & DIE OF HYPERTHERMIA.
Superior Australian Coal & a Nuclear Power future is ESSENTIAL NOT Toxic Solar/Wind/BESS ruination EVERYWHERE!
THIS DESTRUCTIVE PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY RISK IS AGAINST OUR WILL WITHOUT OUR CONSENT - WITH NO SOCIAL LICENCE!
Name Withheld
Object
UARBRY , New South Wales
Message
I object to everything about these so-called “renewable” energy “farms”. There is nothing renewable about them. Their sole purpose is the destruction of our homes and lifestyles in order to benefit a corrupt government.
Rick Martin
Object
Ladysmith , New South Wales
Message
'Being a primary producer all of my life and appreciating the importance of productive agricultural land I am appalled that governments and foreign-owned companies don't appear to have the same appreciation and concerns. With government approval, foreign-owned companies are prepared to deface vast swathes of Australia's productive agricultural land under the religious fervor of net zero.

Ross Garnuat estimates that 3.75 million Ha of solar panels are required to reach net zero in Australia.

Research done by Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) has found that one-third of prime agricultural land needs to be sacrificed for Australia's net zero mandate.

The Dinawan Energy Hub is a prime example of the race to net zero with thousands of tons of foreign-produced steel, thousands of tons of cement, and two million solar panels that will destroy what once was productive grazing land.

From my research, there appears to be no legal framework to force these foreign-owned companies to properly return these vast swathes of sacrificed land back to their original condition. I keep seeing the word, 'should'..... do this, 'should' .....do that. In other words, nothing is binding. If the foreign-owned companies aren't around it will be left to the impacted landowners to do so.'
John Angelico
Object
Narre Warren , Victoria
Message
I am writing to lodge my objection to the above project, which is exceedingly inefficient, wasteful of good agricultural land and unlikely to ever fulfill its business objective without significant government subsidy.

This means that consumers will pay more for electricity generated by this solar "farm", taxpayers like me will have to pay more to fund federal subsidies, or both.
Howard Dewhirst
Object
Burleigh Heads , Queensland
Message
Like all solar plantations, Dinawan is not fit for purpose as, without back up, it cannot provide power 24/7; and when current roof top solar is producing more than enough on either side of noon in the summer, so much so, and scandalously, that wind plantations have to be paid NOT to produce electricity.
The claims that solar can produce cheaper power than fossil fuels are based on the utterly misleading Levelised Cost Analysis which ignores three enormous costs of back up;
1: The cost of construction of back up (currently fossil fuel/ aka gas and coal)
2: The cost of having the back up plant on standby when it is not needed; who would finance and build a nuclear power plant that did not produce power 24/7?
3: The cost of infrastructure to take the power from where it is being made, in the pristine hill tops of our forested great dividing range, to where it is needed in or near big cities. Fossil fuel plants are built near the source of supply and are part of the existing grid.
No fiscally aware government should permit unreliable renewables that are unfit for purpose as they do not come with adequate back up-power as part of the package.
Name Withheld
Object
Rapanyup , Victoria
Message
I object to the dinawan solar facility on the following grounds:
-productive agricultural land should not be consumed for RE projects.
-solar panels can leach chemicals into waterways -BESS pose an unacceptable fire risk -wind turbines have a devastating impact on the landscape - habitat destruction, altering water course and destroying visual amenity.
-wind turbines impact residents’ health and well-being and affect their visual and acoustic amenity.
-lack of social license
-no guarantees VNI west will ever be built - meaning this project should not be able to proceed at this time.
On a broader level, the RE industry is unregulated. Their independent studies are doctored and the government’s regulatory process is compromised by the RUSH for RE in Australia.
I object to the Dinawan Energy Hub.
elizabeth schiemer
Object
Anna Bay , New South Wales
Message
I object to the project as it degrades the environment and damages the land for sustainable produce. I also object to the expenditure for this project without thorough investigation into financial viability and return on investment.
Name Withheld
Object
LAKE ALBERT , New South Wales
Message
I Object to this obnoxious DINAWAN SOLAR + BESS plan as SPARK INFRASTRUCTURE HAVE LONG PROVEN THEIR BOMEN SOLAR ‘FACTORY’ AT WAGGA IS ENVIRONMENTAL VANDALISM - NOT CLEAN & GREEN AT ALL!
Wagga MP Joe McGirr has readily admitted this from his own experience at Bomen, Wagga Wagga where extensive, irreversible Solar ruination has occurred.

The truth is being intentionally repressed by Woke Politicians & Unbalanced, Biased Media due to the BIG MONEY  involved!
🤑IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY!!🤮

All of the Principles of Ecological Sustainable Development & the Aims & Objectives of the NSW Government’s numerous Climate Change Targets & Bills are defied by Spark’s obnoxious, environmentally vandalising Dinawan Solar plan.

The trio of Independent architects of the ‘Decarbonisation of NSW’ in a Decade -Sydney MP Alex Greenwich, Speaker Greg Piper & Wagga MP Dr Joe McGirr have totally failed to benefit communities with any of their claims regarding all the jobs, benefits to biodiversity, soil, air, water & liveability!
The complete opposite has occurred due to  NSW/Federal Government Policy Inflicted Destruction of Nature - the Antithesis of Caring for Country, Skyrocketing RenewaBULL Electricity Prices = Cost of Living Crisis, Suffering, Hardship & Austerity, Loss of Economic Prosperity, Loss of Productivity, Loss of Food Security - Loss of Energy Security - Loss of National Security.

Joe McGirr, Greg Piper & Alex Greenwich - Decarbonisation of NSW in a Decade
https://assets.nationbuilder.com/alexgreenwich/pages/9061/attachments/original/1551394230/Independents_Coal_Transition_Premier_REP_190226_tnl.pdf?1551394230 
28th Feb 2023

Cameron O’Reilly - Executive Director 
Energy Reform & Investment
Energy Climate Change and Sustainability & the discredited CSIRO also got it totally wrong when Cameron O’Reilly wrote on behalf of Matt Kean - 27th July 2020 - 
“You may be interested to know that reports by the Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organisation (CSIRO)and other independent bodies have found that the cheapest, most reliable form of new-build generation is large scale renewables supported by firming technology such as batteries, pumped hydro & gas fired generation. Building new coal or nuclear power stations would be two to four times more expensive than these technologies & would see power prices increase rather than decrease.”

Even though delusional Penny Sharpe says it’s “DOABLE,” NSW Electricity Infrastructure Roadmap has been summed up by the most credible Experts as ‘Shambolic Policy Making ……Dangerous to Grid Operation & Totally Mad!’
With AEMO’s 2022 ISP Electricity Grid Design also shredded by numerous Reputable Experts stating that it -  “CANNOT PROVIDE AUSTRALIANS WITH RELIABLE POWER…..& NO RESPONSIBLE POWER SYSTEMS ENGINEER WOULD PROCEED WITH SUCH A NON-VIABLE PLAN……”
“Furthermore, the implications for the economy and for national security by relying on China, which dominates the market for wind and solar equipment and materials, is extremely negative."

Basically, AEMO’s ISP is a LIE, it's all manipulated and not costed properly at all!
It seeks to shape society & industry to suit their ISP.
No wonder Australia’s productivity is tanking - with industries forced to stand idle due to AEMO’s deceptive RenewaBULL fudgery!
It is detrimentally designed for the Generators interests and NOT the Consumer!
https://www.fresheconomicthinking.com/p/the-sunk-cost-trickery-that-makes?utm_medium=web
AIDAN MORRISON 

Unravelling AEMO's Integrated System Plan: World-class, incompetent, or corrupt?
https://youtu.be/mFcaZ0fgWzk
https://youtu.be/mFcaZ0fgWzk

By far the majority of Industrialised Solar panels are being unethically sourced via cruelly tortured Slave Labour Supply Chains & Solar Inverters manufactured in China are able to be remotely disabled - presenting a huge Cyber Security Threat! 
Additionally, TransGrid stated in Renew Economy 4th Dec 2023 - 
“In July, Transgrid struck a deal with China’s ZTT International for the delivery of more than 17,500 kilometres of high-voltage conductors to get ahead on HumeLink and VNI West."
Instead of Energy Security - these CCP reliant Solar/Wind/BESS plans are ENABLING BEIJING TO TURN OUR LIGHTS OFF!
Australia’s Future Fund is Exposed to Chinese Companies- a Risky Business indeed!
There is Unethical Reliance on Modern Slavery & the NSW DPE  is carelessly & irresponsibly inflicting Moral Hazard - through their Risky Public Health & Safety - Life Threatening Experiments on Rural Communities - Councils & Ratepayers - when they are not substantiated by Scientific Rigour, Engineering Facts, Integrity or Ethics.

MY FAMILY & I DO NOT CONSENT TO SPARK INFRASTRUCTURE’S RISKY DINAWAN SOLAR + BESS EXPERIMENT & THE PLETHORA OF DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS THAT DODGY, IRRESPONSIBLE DPE CARELESSLY APPROVES OF AS THEY INFLICT MORAL HAZARD ON RURAL
COUNCILS/RATEPAYERS AGAINST OUR WILL, WITHOUT OUR CONSENT, WITH NO SOCIAL LICENCE.
Name Withheld
Object
LAKE ALBERT , New South Wales
Message
Australia’s Agricultural Land is meant for productive farming enterprises, NOT Industrialised Junk - part-time power generators like Spark Infrastructure’s 4,000ha - 2 Million Panel Dinawan Solar Electricity Generating Works + BESS.

I OBJECT TO THIS JUNK DINAWAN SOLAR, JUNK BESS PLAN AS IT’S ALL BASED ON LIES & DECEPTION - JUST LIKE DODGY AEMO’s TOTALLY FUDGED, GENERATOR BENEFITING - CONSUMER RIP-OFF JUNK ISP!

The 'Sunk Cost' Trickery That Makes Renewables Seem Cheaper Than They Are - 23rd July 2023.
https://www.fresheconomicthinking.com/p/the-sunk-cost-trickery-that-makes?utm_medium=web
AIDAN MORRISON 

VESTED INTERESTS ARE ENSURING THAT THE ‘CORE OF THE TOTALITARIAN STATE IS THE LIE!’
As Tony Abbott so aptly described:-
“Renewables are Socialism Masquerading as Environmentalism.”
https://stopthesethings.com/2023/12/14/theyre-not-in-kansas-anymore-mid-west-bans-industrial-wind-solar-projects/

Dinawan Solar plan is for Pathetic Pointless Power that can’t deliver power on demand – but that “guarantees economic misery, environmental destruction and community disruption!”

The Government needs to stop its exaggerated hysteria & Stop Equating Climate Change with Climate Danger as the  ‘Carbon Cult’ Obsession is Resulting in a Dire, Contaminating, RenewaBULL Transition to Extinction that has Life Threatening Consequences & is NOT FOR THE GREATER GOOD!

MY FAMILY & I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS CONTAMINATING, ECOCIDAL, ENERGY POVERTY SWINDLE that’s part of the FAKE GREEN SOLAR/WIND GRIFT & PONZI SCHEME/SCAM THAT’S CRUELLY TORTURING EVERYDAY AUSTRALIANS WITH GOVERNMENT INFLICTED COST OF LIVING CRISIS & NON-SENSICAL REQUESTS FROM PENNY SHARPE ON THE 14th DEC - DEPRIVING US OF ESSENTIAL, AFFORDABLE POWER IN HOT WEATHER - TORTURING US WITH HEAT STROKE BECAUSE CRUEL BUREAUCRATIC IDEOLOGICAL BLOCKHEADS IN NSW NO LONGER PROVIDE US ESSENTIAL SUPERIOR, AUSTRALIAN POWER FROM OUR OWN NATURAL RESOURCES.

WE NEED TO TAKE A CHAINSAW TO THE EVIL BUREAUCRACY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS DELUSIONAL, DESTRUCTIVE, ANTI-AUSTRALIAN AGENDA - OFFERING US THE WORLD & PAYING US WITH TRANSGRID’S SPARK INFRASTRUCTURE TRASH!!

References:
TWO NEW PRECEDENTS HAVE BEEN SET by Oxley Bridge Rd Uranquinty Solar Determination 24th Nov 2022 - NEW MODERN SLAVERY CONDITION & AMENDED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (re CONTAMINATION.)

**Professor Ian Plimer's 3 minute presentation regarding Solar Panel Contamination Risks.
PPSSTH-149 - DA22/0122 - 1268 Oxley Bridge Road Uranquinty 2652
https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/planning-panel/electricity-generating-works-solar-farm-8

**Hail Storm Photos & Industrialised Solar Contamination Risk to Our Reliably Productive Food Bowl at Bomen, Wagga Wagga Photo are included via this link also - the Hail Stones & some of the Fractured Solar Panels from the damaging 31st Oct 2020 event that left masses of broken Solar panels in situ for a shocking 10 - 11 months without Due Care - with some panels still remaining fractured & leaching contaminating heavy metals years later!

1. NEW MODERN SLAVERY CONDITION- requiring proof prior to construction that NO Slave Labour supply chain components be used in construction.
**New Condition Inserted C4A - Dealing With Modern Slavery.
Commonwealth Modern Slavery Act 2018

*NSW Local Council Act 1993
428 Annual Report
438 ZE Duty to Ensure Goods & Services Are Not Procured From Modern Slavery.

This applies to all NSW Government Bodies - including Councils - for those who Host, Procure or have a Power Purchase Agreement with Solar/Wind Energy Generation/BESS whose construction has used Modern Slavery Supply Chain Sourced Components
eg. City of Sydney, the Opera House, Kiama, Shoalhaven, Shellharbour Councils & Westpac, etc. have an unethical PPA with Spark Infrastructure’s Xinjiang Jinko Solar based Bomen Solar - unethically Hosted by Wagga City Council.
REROC has an unethical PPA with Iberdrola - with Xinjiang JA Solar based Avonlie Solar - unethically Hosted by Narrandera Shire.

2. AMENDED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN CONDITION re-CONTAMINATION – QUALIFIED TESTING/REPORTING, CONTAMINATION RESPONSE PROCEDURE, etc.

**Amended Condition C8.
Prior to Commencement of Any Works - Storm Water Management Plan.
On Site & Discharge From the Site.
Testing Points & Regular Water Samples, Suitably Qualified Person.
Written Response Procedures if CONTAMINATION is Found - required PRIOR to CONSTRUCTION.
Availability of Results.
……………………………..

Dr James Cockayne
NSW Anti-slavery Commissioner
M: +61 0455 255 453
[email protected]

Carolyn Kitto ‘Be Slavery Free’
Ph: 0438 040 959
[email protected]

Ramila Chanisheff
Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association - AUTWA
University of S.A
Ph: 0461 402 531 706
[email protected]
---------------------------------

Slave Labour Supply Chains
Missing Information Thwarts Ethical Sourcing
Murphy and Crawford’s report, Over-Exposed: Uyghur Region Exposure Assessment for Solar Industry Sourcing

**The graphs indicating companies & solar panels connected to Xinjiang are in the following 2 links:-
https://desdemonadespair.net/2021/05/forced-labor-from-chinas-uighur-muslims-behind-global-supply-of-solar-panels.html

**Xinjiang Solar Panels - Uyghur Slave Labour/Concentration Camps/Genocide - 'In Broad Daylight' - Professor Laura Murphy
https://www.shu.ac.uk/-/media/home/research/helena-kennedy-centre/projects/pdfs/evidence-base/in-broad-daylight.pdf

**The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner For Human Rights
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/countries/2022-08-31/22-08-31-final-assesment.pdf

**Australia ratifies International Forced Labour Protocol | Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs Minister for Women Marise Payne
https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/marise-payne/media-release/australia-ratifies-international-forced-labour-protocol

**Implementation of the Magnitsky Act is another avenue to ensure this shamefully unethical industry is not exploited in Australia.

**BLOOD BATTERIES - THE DARK SIDE OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES - Gravitas Plus YouTube
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RFHvq-8np1o

**THE DISTURBING REALITY OF COBALT MINING FOR RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES.
“CLEAN COBALT IS A FICTION – THERE IS NO CLEAN COBALT - IT'S ALL MARKETING!”
People need to get educated so they are agitated about it enough to do something to change this.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/mining/harvard-professor-explains-heartwrenching-source-of-electric-vehicle-iphone-batteries/news-story/db881f47c76db89581409c092a740c4c
Joe Rogan exposes sad truth about cobalt used in electric vehicle, iPhone batteries |news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site.
Cobalt is in all iPhones, tablets & crucially EV's - it maximises charge & stability.
Before anyone knew what was happening the Chinese Government & Chinese companies took control of almost all of the big mines in the Congo, with the local population displaced & the Congolese people under duress - digging in subhuman, gut wrenching conditions - using all raw human force - clanking the cobalt out of the ground!
Throughout the whole history of slavery, never has there been more suffering that generated more profit than was linked to more lives of people around the world than what is happening today in the Congo - mining cobalt in appalling, heart wrenching & dangerous conditions.
…………………
**Sediment Run-Off Contaminating Land/Water - Court Case -
“Created, Operated, and Maintained a Nuisance”
Solar farm runoff pollutes property, couple awarded $135 million - CFACT
https://www.cfact.org/2023/06/06/solar-farm-runoff-pollutes-property-couple-awarded-135-million/
By Bonner Cohen, Ph. D. |June 6th, 2023
25th Oct 2023 update …A federal judge has dramatically reduced a jury’s $135 million award to a Georgia couple (https://www.ajc.com/news/couple-awarded-135m-after-solar-project-turns-their-lake-to-mud-hole/BZ6BYXQREJCDROQV6ZASUW5WOI/) whose property was fouled by muddy runoff from a solar project next door down to $5 million, after objections from the plaintiffs in the case.
In an order issued Monday in the Middle District of Georgia, Judge Clay D. Land wrote that the punitive damages awarded to the couple were worth many magnitudes more than the property that was damaged, and therefore were excessive.

**The Starting Step for the Production Of Pure Silicon....SiO2 + C -> Si + CO2 ....IS the Heart of the Solar Panel!

**Every step in the production of Solar PV power systems requires an input of fossil fuels - as the carbon reductants needed for smelting silicon from ore, to provide manufacturing process heat and power, for the intercontinental transport of materials, and for on-site deployment.
https://www.azbackroads.com/around-the-west/rangefire-massive-amounts-of-coal-and-wood-must-be-burned-to-create-solar-panels/

**200 Million Tonnes of Toxic Solar Panels Destined For Landfills Near You
stopthesethings.com

**SARET Research - Fire and Rescue NSW have NO IDEA How to Deal With RISKY RenewaBULL Experiments - YET This TOXIC MORAL HAZARD is Deliberately Forced on us by the Dodgy, Deceitful DPE & Complicit IPCN!
https://www.fire.nsw.gov.au/page.php?id=9402
“There is a general lack of guidance and provisions in building codes, standards, and legislation in relation to safety to address the potential risks from these emerging technologies. Part of the problem is that we do not yet know enough about their probability of failure, their mechanisms of failure and potential consequences of failure.”

**The $10 billion cabal of renewable subsidies killing coal - Alan Moran - 24th July 2023
https://www.regulationeconomics.com/_files/ugd/b6987c_a76d14823d6342a298b70841f99b7f71.pdf
Name Withheld
Object
WALCHA , New South Wales
Message
This project will not ever be able to generate reliable, affordable base-load electricity, and will only cause willful environmental harm & destruction.
Name Withheld
Object
WALCHA , New South Wales
Message
This project is not ever going to be able to generate reliable, affordable base-load electricity, and will only cause willful environmental destruction. This project is being considered as Green and Clean energy. There is nothing clean or green about most of what's involved to get this project running.
Helen Gooden
Object
Cootamundra , New South Wales
Message
Objection to proposal:
EIS - incorrect data.
Does not take into complexities and impact to the long term local environment.
There is no detailed plan for recycling or decommissioning .
There needs to be an ongoing contributing fund by the proponent to pay for decommissioning at the end of the project.
The adjoining land holders - should be engaged in a profit sharing arrangement . Those being greatly impacted by the project are not necessarily the host.
All the proposed developments should obey the new renewable guidelines . The Department, should give an iron clad guarantee that the decommissioning will not fall back on the land owner.
I would welcoming a meeting with the department prior to decisions being made.
James and Helen Gooden
Name Withheld
Object
WARRAWEE , New South Wales
Message
See attached documents.
Attachments

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
SSD-50725959
EPBC ID Number
2023/09516
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Electricity Generation - Solar
Local Government Areas
Murrumbidgee

Contact Planner

Name
Pragya Mathema