State Significant Development
Wallarah 2 Coal Mine
Central Coast
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Attachments & Resources
Application (2)
Request for DGRS (1)
DGRs (2)
EIS (29)
Submissions (23)
Public Hearing (13)
Response to Submissions (8)
Amendments (25)
Assessment (1)
Recommendation (29)
Determination (4)
Approved Documents
There are no post approval documents available
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Gordon Lardner
Object
Gordon Lardner
Message
Shane Mcquisten
Support
Shane Mcquisten
Message
Michael Clark
Support
Michael Clark
Message
The direct impact of the mine has been well assessed with a very small operational footprint and minimal impact.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Regardless of any findings of an environmental impact study purported by Wallarah 2 Coal Project the approval of this coal mine for an off shore entity's benefit is unacceptable to the residents of the Central Coast especially when the generation of jobs for the local unemployed will be minimal.
The possible impact to the Central Coast's water supply and the impact of coal dust on the health of local residents is too greater risk.
The northern areas of the Central Coast are being impacted by rapid housing development without sufficient public consultation and consideration of the environmental impact.
To approve the establishment of a coal mine would just confirm that the NSW Department of Planning and Environment is mute to the voice of the residents of the area.
David Middleton
Support
David Middleton
Message
Having also familiarized myself with the concerns raised by the Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council (LALC), and my understanding that Wyong Coal has redesigned the coal
transportation infrastructure and sewer connection for the
Project to avoid Aboriginal land, I am comfortable to provide my support to the project.
Andrew Emery
Support
Andrew Emery
Message
Jason Murray
Support
Jason Murray
Message
Dean Amos
Support
Dean Amos
Message
shannon dransfield
Support
shannon dransfield
Message
Shane Matheson
Support
Shane Matheson
Message
I believe Wallarah 2 will operate with similar high standards and the project will bring much needed job support to the local area and provide ongoing benefits to many communities and groups.
I live locally on the Central Coast and am excited at the possibility of being able to work locally rather than having to stay away while working.
Regards
Shane
Anthony Fardell
Support
Anthony Fardell
Message
ATCO SL
Support
ATCO SL
Message
Geoffrey Kent
Support
Geoffrey Kent
Message
Craig Nosworthy
Support
Craig Nosworthy
Message
I am writing a submission for the Wallarah coal mine in full support of it. As a coal miner in todays volatile Australian economy people like myself need coal mines in order to have a positive life amd contribute to the Australian economy. I have three young children and work in mining currently but have alot of time off at times between mines because of the lack of work, especially as a contractor. Places like Wallarah 2 give ordinary Australians like me a place to work and look after us financially to take care of our families. Please consider giving Wallarah 2 a positive start and a fair go. The economy is built on places such as Wallarah 2.
Kind regards, Craig Nosworthy.
Troy Straker
Support
Troy Straker
Message
Rafael Brymora
Support
Rafael Brymora
Message
- Firstly, I declare that I currently work in the coal industry in the Hunter Valley
- Secondly, I support this project.
The project has a long history that has evaluated all aspects, from economic, to environmental, to water. This current amendment has reduced the project's footprint at the site, which must be seen as a huge improvement to the local ecology and environment. This is a positive step for the project.
As a final comment, the NSW government must give permission to coal resource projects going ahead. It is in the national interest. Australian coal has excellent properties (coal quality), that allows it to substitute coal of lesser quality from overseas. This means that there is a net benefit from an emissions perspective. Finally, the NSW government must stand up to illogical arguments from the protesters to this project. They are fundamentally opposed to any coal resource project. This is not in the national interest, nor the local interest. This project will provide local jobs and business.
Rodney Smith
Object
Rodney Smith
Message
The information provided indicates that subsidence under my property will be in the area of 0.5m to 0.75m on the maps but the EIS statements indicate only minor subsidence up to 150mm. How is this so?
Also the impacts of flooding on my property have not been fully quantified. While the 1% AEP flood level might not the change the occurrence of minor flooding affectation of my property will increase with subsidence. Minor floods will now start to affect my property. This has not been quantified by the applicant. This will affect the usage of my property where I run horses. Will I be compensated for the reduction in usage of my property.
Will the subsidence of my land (not my building) be reinstated back to original heights to ensure continued usage of my property as it is now?
Rodney Smith
Object
Rodney Smith
Message
mark stone
Object
mark stone
Message
the government is spending millions of tax payer dollars to protect these waterways and this project goes against everything we are trying to protect.
I believe the wallarah two project should keep the mine head on the western side of the railway and pay the money for the use of the aboriginal land to protect this precious waterway.
even then this waterway is under threat.
we have lived on this waterway for many years and watch the breeding cycle of the fish and birds that rely on this waterway.
it's called spring creek because of a natural spring at the end of the waterway which has been hit and closed by a mine in the past . it is now running again and that's one of the things that make this waterway unique.
I am against the changes to the plans for the wallarah two coal mine. they will make billions out of the project over it life and need to pay for the use of the aboriginal land .
mark stone
Object
mark stone
Message
I am against the changed plans for wallarah2 coal mine.
coal dust blown from the north east and north west winds will blow into blue haven which I believe could effect our health and cover our cars , windows ,solar panels and washing with black coal dust.
the noise from coal trains stopping ,starting and just moving in general will effect and change our now peaceful lives.
I moved to blue haven 22yrs ago with my young family and intended to retire here living on the pristine waterway that runs into Tuggerah lakes.[spring creek]. now if this project goes ahead we will have to sell our home and move away.
why should I have to move because of noise generated by a company from overseas.
just because the government makes money from the project is not good enough reason to destroy Australian peoples lives.
I am against the proposed changes to the wallarah 2 coal mine and believe they should keep the original plan of having the mine head on the western side of the railway and pay the price asked by the land owners.
THIS PROJECT WILL MAKE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OVER IT'S LIFE SPAN. paying money to use aboriginal land should not be a problem.
the northern rail line is on the western side of the rail line anyway so the project needs to be on the western side of the railway to head north to Newcastle port for loading.
coal trains would have to cross commuter train lines fully loaded or major infrastructure would have to be built to get fully loaded coal trains across the busy commuter rail line.
it's not rocket science. pay for the use of the aboriginal land and save millions of dollars building rail infrastructure.
I OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES
MARK STONE