State Significant Development
Determination
St Marys Resource Recovery Facility (Borg)
Penrith
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Use of an existing resource recovery facility for the sorting and processing of primarily wood and timber waste. It is proposed to increase the throughput of waste on site to from 18,000 tonnes per annum (tpa) to 150,000 tpa
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Showing 1 - 7 of 7 submissions
Cornelis Duba
Comment
Cornelis Duba
Comment
HUNTINGWOOD
,
New South Wales
Message
Please refer to the attachments.
Attachments
Sydney Water
Comment
Sydney Water
Comment
TRANSPORT FOR NSW
Comment
TRANSPORT FOR NSW
Comment
Chippendale
,
New South Wales
Message
TfNSW Response
Attachments
JSE Properties Pty Ltd
Object
JSE Properties Pty Ltd
Object
AUCHENFLOWER
,
Queensland
Message
To whom it may concern:
We own and operator significant businesses within the Dunheved Business Park and have so for many years. We are also substantial owners of industrial property within the Dunheved Business Park.
We strongly object to the State Significant Development Application for 25 Dunheved Rd on the basis that the road infrastructure is already inadequate to cope with the amount of traffic coming in and out of the business park.
Operation of the proposed facility at 25 Dunheved Rd at the throughput levels stated will be severely detrimental to existing businesses like ours due to increased traffic congestion, particularly at the single entry/exit to the business park which has been failing to cope for some time. Should the proposal go ahead, we expect that our businesses will incur substantial losses due to increased distribution costs and an inability to continue to meet customer delivery requirements.
In support our submission, we engaged our traffic consultants (GTA) to perform a peer review of the Traffic Impact Assessment. Attached is their report which identifies a number of items that should have been concerned and also highlights some inconsistencies in the assessment relative to standards. Page 5 of their report provides a summary and recommendations.
There have been long standing plans for a second entry/exit point for the business park via Links Rd and we don’t believe that the proposed facility at 25 Dunheved Rd should be allowed to operate until the second entry/point is built and operational to alleviate the traffic issues.
We look forward to an opportunity to discuss our objection further with you.
King Regards,
Greg Holt
We own and operator significant businesses within the Dunheved Business Park and have so for many years. We are also substantial owners of industrial property within the Dunheved Business Park.
We strongly object to the State Significant Development Application for 25 Dunheved Rd on the basis that the road infrastructure is already inadequate to cope with the amount of traffic coming in and out of the business park.
Operation of the proposed facility at 25 Dunheved Rd at the throughput levels stated will be severely detrimental to existing businesses like ours due to increased traffic congestion, particularly at the single entry/exit to the business park which has been failing to cope for some time. Should the proposal go ahead, we expect that our businesses will incur substantial losses due to increased distribution costs and an inability to continue to meet customer delivery requirements.
In support our submission, we engaged our traffic consultants (GTA) to perform a peer review of the Traffic Impact Assessment. Attached is their report which identifies a number of items that should have been concerned and also highlights some inconsistencies in the assessment relative to standards. Page 5 of their report provides a summary and recommendations.
There have been long standing plans for a second entry/exit point for the business park via Links Rd and we don’t believe that the proposed facility at 25 Dunheved Rd should be allowed to operate until the second entry/point is built and operational to alleviate the traffic issues.
We look forward to an opportunity to discuss our objection further with you.
King Regards,
Greg Holt
Attachments
SafeWork NSW
Comment
SafeWork NSW
Comment
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Support
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Support
Sydney
,
New South Wales
Message
EPA has issued GTAs for project
Attachments
Penrith City Council
Comment
Penrith City Council
Comment
Pagination
Project Details
Application Number
SSD-10474
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Waste collection, treatment and disposal
Local Government Areas
Penrith
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider