Skip to main content

State Significant Development

Determination

Atlassian - Office and Hotel Development

City of Sydney

Current Status: Determination

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare EIS
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

Office and Hotel Tower and Adaptive Reuse of the Former Inwards Parcel Sheds

Consolidated Consent

Consolidated Consent

Archive

Early Consultation (1)

site location

Notice of Exhibition (1)

SSD-10405 Notice of Exhibition

Request for SEARs (2)

Request for SEARs_20191126034615
SEARs Scoping Report and Appendices

SEARs (2)

Issued SEARs
Issued SEARs_20122019_115402

EIS (40)

Environmental Impact Statement
Appendix A - SEARs
Appendix A1 - Draft Western Gateway Design Guide
Appendix B - SEARs Response Table
Appendix C - Quantity Surveyors Report
Appendix D - Title and Survey Plans
Appendix E - Architectural Plans and Design Report
Appendix F - Endorsed Design Excellence Strategy
Appendix G - Design Competition Report
Appendix H - Design Integrity Endorsement
Appendix I - Heritage Impact Statement
Appendix J - Heritage Conservation Mgmt Plan
Appendix K - Historical Archaeological Assessment
Appendix L - Aboriginal Cultural Heritage
Appendix L1 (Appendix B of ACHA) - Geotech Data
Appendix M - Transport Impact Assessment
Appendix M1 - Loading Dock Management Plan
Appendix N - Transport Infrastructure Assessment
Appendix O - Construction Ped Traffic Mgmt Plan
Appendix P - Noise and Vibration Assessment
Appendix Q - ESD Report
Appendix R - Civil, Stormwater and Flood Report
Appendix S - Visual Impact Assessment
Appendix T - Wind Impact Assessment
Appendix U - Air Quality Assessment
Appendix V - External Reflectivity Assessment
Appendix W - Social Impact Assessment
Appendix X - CPTED Report
Appendix Y - Biodiversity Assessment Waiver
Appendix Z - Prelim Construction Management Plan
Appendix AA - Waste Management Report
Appendix BB - Building Services Utility Report
Appendix CC - Site Investigation (Contamination)
Appendix DD - Remediation Action Plan
Appendix DD1 - Site Auditor Interim Advice
Appendix EE - Geotechnical Investigation Report
Appendix FF - BCA, Access and DDA Assessment
Appendix GG - Consultation Report
Appendix HH - Public Art Strategy
Appendix II - Model

Response to Submissions (24)

Appendix H_Wind Environment Report_ (1)
Updated Appendix D Heritage Response Report
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment
Appendix M_CPS Letter of Support_
Response to Submissions Report_SSD-10405
Appendix A_Design Integrity Panel Feedback_
Appendix B_Supp Design Report and Arch Plans_P1_
Appendix B_Supp Design Report and Arch Plans_P2_
Appendix B_Supp Design Report and Arch Plans_P3_
Appendix C1_Subdivision Plans_
Appendix C2_Preferred DA Conditions - Subdivision_
Appendix D_Heritage Response Report_Superseded by Updated Appendix D
Appendix E_Traffic and Access Response Report_
Appendix F_ESD Response Report_
Appendix G_Acoustic, Noise and Vibration Response_
Appendix I_Civil Response Report_
Appendix J_Updated Trans Infra Impact Asmt_
Appendix K_Air Quality Response Memo_
Appendix L_Updated Prelim Construction Mgmt Plan_
Appendix N_TOGA Letter of Support_
Appendix O_Draft YHA Plan of Management_
Appendix P_Addendum Cost Summary Statement_
Appendix Q_Site Auditor Interim Advice Letter_
Appendix R_WGDG Compliance Table_

Agency Advice (27)

Sydney Water email (SSD-10405)
HNSW ACH - SSD-10405 Atlassian Supplementary RTS
CoS to DPIE - Atlassian
SSD 10405 - Sup. RTS esponse
TfNSW_ Atlassian (SSD-10405) - Supplementary RtS
TfNSW_ Atlassian (SSD-10405) - Supplementary RtS
TfNSW_Atlassian Development (SSD-10405) - RtS
DPIE Water response
SSD 10405 - RTS response
HNSW ACH - SSD-10405 Atlassian RTS
SSD-10405- No Comment Letter
CoS to DPIE Atlassian RtS
EPA Response - Request for SEARs - SSD 10405
EES response - 8-10 Lee St - SEARs - 9 Dec 2019
Response 8-10 Lee St - SEARs - 9 Dec 2019.
TfNSW_SEARs for 8-10 Lee St, Haymarket (SSD-10405)
SSD 10405 8-10 SEARS response
CoS - 8-10 Lee St Haymarket - SSD10405
SEARs - 8-10 Lee St Haymarket - SSD10405
SEARs - 8-10 Lee St Haymarket - SSD10405
DPIE Water response
Atlassian Development - SSD-10405 - EPA comments
Signed letter SSD 10405
Response to EIS - SSD 10405
TfNSW_Atlassian Development (SSD-10405)
Atlassian - Office and Hotel Dev (SSD-10405)
SSD 10405 - response

Amendments (1)

Scoping Meeting Request_20191122000008

Additional Information (7)

Supplementary RtS Response Report
Appendix A - RFI Wind Memo
Appendix B - Reflectivity Clarification Memo
Appendix C - Revised Construction Staging
Appendix D - Archaeological Research Design
Appendix E - Road Safety Audit
Appendix F - Landscape Plans

Determination (12)

SSD-10405 Stamped Plans Part 3 of 9
Atlassian (SSD -10405) Assessment Report
SSD-10405 Stamped Plans Part 7 of 9
SSD-10405 Stamped Plans Part 9 of 9
SSD-10405 Stamped Plans Part 5 of 9
SSD-10405 Stamped Plans Part 1 of 9
SSD-10405 Stamped Plans Part 8 of 9
SSD-10405 Stamped Plans Part 6 of 9
SSD-10405 Stamped Plans Part 4 of 9
SSD-10405 Stamped Plans Part 2 of 9
Notice of decision
Atlassian (SSD -10405) Instrument of Consent

Post-determination Notices (1)

SSD-10405 - Notice of Determination

Approved Documents

Management Plans and Strategies (26)

Approval of SRDEP_ 24082022
Appendix I - Unexpected Finds Protocol - Contamination
Appendix G1 - Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
Appendix H - Construction Flood Emergency Response Sub-Plan
Appendix F - BOJV Construction Waste Management Plan
Appendix G - Construction Soil and Water Mgmt Sub Plan
Appendix B - Devonshire Street Tunnel Management Plan
Appendix C - Railway Colonnade Drive Management Plan
Condition E15 - Construction Environmental Management Plan
Appendix A - Eastern Elevation Management Plan
Appendix K - Waste Classification Procedure
Appendix D - Construction Traffic and Ped Mgmt Sub-Plan
Appendix E - Construction Noise Vib and Dust Mgmt Plan
Conditions E26 & E27 - Dewatering Management Plan
Approval of Plan Strategy or Study_18082022_035650
Heritage Management Plan_FINAL_3 August 2022
Condition C5 - SRDEP Rev 8
Condition C4 - Approval of DDHFM
Condition C4 - DDHFM
Condition C6 - Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Rev D 09062022
App J - Unexpected Finds Protocol - Aboriginal and Heritage
Condition C6 - Approval letter of THPP
Condition C6 - SWMP 16052022
Condition C6 - THPP Rev 7 06062022
Condition C6 - Supplementary Geotechnical Investigation
Condition C6 - Report on Impact Assessment

Reports (6)

SSD10405_Condition E9b + E10_Cover Letter
Condition E41 - Secretary Approval
Condition E41 - Excavation Director Application
Atlassian E44 Approval letter-SSD-10405-PA-1
HAARD November 2021_1
HC NSW response to HAARD - SSD 10405 - E44

Other Documents (1)

Condition C1 - Heritage Consultant Engagement

Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.

Complaints

Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?

Make a Complaint

Enforcements

There are no enforcements for this project.

Inspections

There are no inspections for this project.

Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.

Submissions

Filters
Showing 1 - 20 of 22 submissions
Name Withheld
Support
SYDNEY , New South Wales
Message
It is about time the land around a major transport hub like Central Station is utilised more effectively with a more high density buildings.
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Comment
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
Hi David,
Please find attached the EPA's comments on the Atlassian - Office and Hotel Development.
Kind regards,
Mark Hanemann
Attachments
Fire and Rescue NSW
Comment
Greenacre , New South Wales
Message
Fire & Rescue NSW (FRNSW) acknowledge the receipt of your email on the 10th December 2020, requesting input into the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Atlassian - Office and Hotel Development.

FRNSW have reviewed the documentation that was provided in support of the development and provide the following comments and recommendations for consideration:
• FRNSW are satisfied with the risk and hazard aspect of the proposal.

• That a comprehensive Emergency Response Plan (ERP) is developed for the site.

• That the ERP specifically addresses foreseeable on-site and off-site fire events and other emergency incidents or potential hazmat incidents.

• That the ERP details the appropriate risk control measures that would need to be implemented to safely mitigate potential risks to the health and safety of firefighters and other first responders.

Such measures will include the level of personal protective clothing required to be worn, the minimum level of respiratory protection required, decontamination procedures to be instigated and minimum evacuation zone distances.

• Other risk control measures that may need to be implemented in a fire emergency (due to any unique hazards specific to the site) should also be included in the ERP.

• That two copies of the ERP (detailed in recommendation 1 above) be stored in a prominent ‘Emergency Information Cabinet’ located in a position directly adjacent to the site’s main entry point/s.

• Once constructed and prior to operation, that the operator of the facility contacts the relevant local emergency management committee (LEMC). The LEMC is a committee established by Section 28 of the State Emergency and Rescue Management Act 1989. LEMCs are required to be established so that emergency services organisations and other government and non-government agencies can proactively develop comprehensive inter agency local emergency procedures for significant hazardous sites within their local government area. The contact details of members of the LEMC can be obtained from the relevant local council.

• FRNSW notes that a number of performance solutions are identified in the BCA report (prepared by Blackett Maguire + Goldsmith, 22nd September, 2020). The identified performance solutions are required to be addressed and approved through consultation with FRNSW and the submission of a fire engineering brief questionnaire (FEBQ).

For further information please contact the Fire Safety Infrastructure Liaison Unit, referencing FRNSW file number BFS20/4062. Please ensure that all correspondence in relation to this matter is submitted electronically to [email protected]
Name Withheld
Support
ultimo , New South Wales
Message
not much comments for that project. But I think is quite good
SYDNEY TRAINS
Comment
BURWOOD , New South Wales
Message
Sydney Trains comments will be now forwarded as part of a joint Transport Cluster submission.

Regards
Jim Tsirimiagos
Town Planning Manager
Sydney Trains
Name Withheld
Object
CHIPPENDALE , New South Wales
Message
The project will interupt residents and road-users with extreme noises and road blockades. The area is already developed and very dense. There is no need to make further changes/expansion just for the sake of commercial purposes.
Biodiversity and Conservation Division
Comment
PARRAMATTA , New South Wales
Message
Please find attached EES response
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
WOLLSTONECRAFT , New South Wales
Message
Central station is a highly significant heritage building. A tower development will adversely impact the building as well as being out of scale and character. This development should not proceed in any form. It should be abandoned.
Valerie Le Bihan
Object
GREENWICH , New South Wales
Message
I am the owner of an investment property at 38 Chalmers st Surry Hills.

As such I am concerned that no visual or solar impact assessment has been made for our buildings (34 and 38 Chalmers st are residential buildings).
We stand right across the railway from the proposed 40 storey towers the height and bulk of which, will no doubt impact our enjoyment of the afternoon sun (the only time we get sunlight) and be visually obtrusive.

While the Atlassian tower on its own, might not create too much of an issue, the assessments should should be made for the impact from the entire project.
As the projected view from Prince Alfred Park shows, we will be looking at a massive wall of 3 towers with minimal space between them when the Fraser Dexus buildings are added to the picture.
That is of course less than an idyllic view from all directions.

Moreover, I really believe that the area could have been redeveloped with much more regard for the heritage buildings around and more imagination.
Of course it's just about money so skyscrapers are all the go whether suitable or not. They will ruin an area that could have retained so much character with wholistic planning rather than ad hoc unsollicited development proposals..
There is no planning here...
Now that there is a 4th tower in the works (Toga above the Adina Hotel) , the impact on the lovely heritage buildings will be worse than one can picture.
The white shadows on the assessment photos hardly show the reality

I also do not see such a great need for more office space, hotel rooms and or retail space in the area in a city already full of those with many vacant and for lease.
A missed opportunity by Planning NSW and City Council alike to make the Southern end of the CBD a more open, light filled, pedestrian friendly, character full area working to enhance what is already there rather than dwarf and disrespect it.
Action for Public Transport (NSW) Inc
Object
LINDFIELD , New South Wales
Message
See both attached PDFs
Attachments
National Trust
Object
Millers Point , New South Wales
Message
Please see attached
Attachments
City of Sydney
Comment
SYDNEY , New South Wales
Message
Dear David

Please find attached the City's comments on the proposed Atlassian+YHA development.

Regards
David Zabell
Senior Planner, Planning Assessments
Attachments
Name Witheld
Object
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Sydney Airport
Comment
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
CASA
Comment
Phillip , Australian Capital Territory
Message
Attachments
Department of Transport
Comment
Chippendale , New South Wales
Message
A copy of the TfNSW response letter is attached.
Attachments
Heritage NSW – Aboriginal cultural heritage (ACH)
Comment
QUEANBEYAN , New South Wales
Message
Dear David,
Attached is a copy of the Heritage NSW submission on Aboriginal cultural heritage matters for the Atlassian development (SSD-10405).

Apologies for the delay in forwarding this to you.

If you have any questions regarding the letter please feel free to contact me.

Jackie Taylor
Senior Team Leader, Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Regulation - South
Attachments
Stephanie Bellango
Comment
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Water Group
Comment
,
Message
The Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) - Water and the Natural Resources Access Regulator (NRAR) have reviewed the Atlassian - Office and Hotel Development EIS and have provided comments in the attached.
Attachments
Sydney Water
Comment
PARRAMATTA , New South Wales
Message
Attachments

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
SSD-10405
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Accommodation
Local Government Areas
City of Sydney
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider
Director
Last Modified By
SSD-10405-Mod-1
Last Modified On
17/08/2022

Contact Planner

Name
David Glasgow