Skip to main content

State Significant Development

Determination

Amending Concept DA - Waterloo Metro Quarter OSD

City of Sydney

Current Status: Determination

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare EIS
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

Changes to the approved building envelope and use at the Northern Precinct to enable the development of a commercial office building on the site.

Attachments & Resources

Notice of Exhibition (1)

Notice of Exhibition_05112020_081849

Early Consultation (1)

Scoping Report - Amending DA - Plans

Request for SEARs (1)

Scoping Report - Amending DA - FINAL

SEARs (1)

Issued SEARs_09042020_021451

EIS (48)

Environmental Impact Statement_Amending DA
Appendix A - Amending SEARs
Appendix B – Quantity Surveyor
Appendix C - Site Title & Survey
Appendix D - Architectural Drawings_41
Appendix E - Urban Design Report_41_Part1
Appendix E - Urban Design Report_41_Part2
Appendix E - Urban Design Report_41_Part3
Appendix E - Urban Design Report_41_Part4
Appendix E - Urban Design Report_41_Part5
Appendix F - Architectural Design Report
Appendix F - Architectural Design Report
Appendix F - Architectural Design Report
Appendix F - Architectural Design Report
Appendix F - Architectural Design Report
Appendix G - Endorsed Design Excellence Strategy
Appendix H - Heritage Impact
Appendix I - Traffic and Parking
Appendix J - Preliminary CTMP Pt 1
Appendix J - Preliminary CTMP Pt 2
Appendix J - Preliminary CTMP Pt 3
Appendix J - Preliminary CTMP Pt 4
Appendix K - Noise and Vibration Pt 1
Appendix K - Noise and Vibration Pt 2
Appendix L - Operational Waste
Appendix M - ESD and Sustainability
Appendix N - CPTED
Appendix O - Stormwater Mgm & Flood Impact
Appendix P - Structural Report_40_41
Appendix Q - CEMP
Appendix R - BCA Assessment_41
Appendix S - DDA Assessment_41
Appendix T - Services and Utilities
Appendix U - Pre-lodgement Consultation Report
Appendix V - BDAR Waiver
Appendix W - Transportation Air Quality
Appendix X - Waterloo Design Amenity Guidelines
Appendix Y - Design Integrity Report
Appendix Z - Solar Reflectivity Statement
z_Appendix AA - View Impact
z_Appendix BB - Landscape Plans_41
Appendix CC - Sec 8.2 Landscape Report
Appendix CC - Sec 8.2 Landscape Report
Appendix CC - Sec 8.2 Landscape Report
Appendix CC - Sec 8.2 Landscape Report
Appendix CC - Sec 8.2 Landscape Report
z_Appendix DD - Wind Impact
z_Appendix EE - Overshadowing Analysis_41

Response to Submissions (6)

Request RTS_14122020
RtS Report - SSD-10441
Appendix A - Supplementary Design Report
Appendix B - Revised Design Integrity Report
Appendix C - Design and Amenity Guidelines
Appendix D - Wind Environment Assessment

Recommendation (2)

Recommended Conditions - SSD-10441
Recommendation - Assessment Report

Determination (4)

Assessment Report - SSD-10441
Stamped Plans - SSD-10441
Notice of Decision - SSD-10441
Development Consent - SSD-10441

Approved Documents

Other Documents (5)

Notice of Modification to SSD 9393
Attachment A - Schedule 3 - SSD-10441
Attachment B - Stamped Plans - SSD-10441
Attachment C - Consolidated Consent SSD9393
Attachment D - Landowner's consent letter 20.08.21

Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.

Complaints

Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?

Make a Complaint

Enforcements

There are no enforcements for this project.

Inspections

There are no inspections for this project.

Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.

Submissions

Filters
Showing 1 - 20 of 20 submissions
Biodiversity and Conservation Division
Comment
PARRAMATTA , New South Wales
Message
Please find attached EES response
Attachments
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Comment
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
Based on the information provided, the proposal does not constitute a Scheduled Activity under Schedule 1 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO Act). At this stage, the EPA does not consider that the proposal will require an Environment Protection Licence (EPL) under the POEO Act.
As an advisory note, the development will be located in the vicinity of tunnels containing operational rail lines, for which the EPA has a regulatory responsibility. The consent should include acceptable vibration and ground borne noise limits for spaces within the development drawn from the EPA’s Rail Infrastructure Noise Guideline (EPA, 2013) and Assessing Vibration: A Technical Guideline (DECC, 2006).
As the applicant is a private developer and not a NSW public authority, the EPA would not be the appropriate regulatory authority under the POEO Act for the environmental performance of the OSD project.
The EPA has no comment on EIS.
Name Withheld
Support
ALEXANDRIA , New South Wales
Message
The reduction in height of the building will look much better!
John Hackett
Comment
Alexandria , New South Wales
Message
I live very close to this project and while I am happy for such a project to go ahead I am very concerned about the size of it and the extra traffic it may cause. The car access to my building is via Botany Lane and the one way section of Buckland st. This is slow enough with the amount of traffic now and I fear this will become even slower with an increase. I am also concerned about the potential loss of sunlight to my apartment in the afternoon, particularly in winter when it's most needed.
Name Withheld
Object
Counterpoint Community Services Inc
Comment
WATERLOO , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Andrew Andersons
Comment
PADDINGTON , New South Wales
Message
Please find attached a detailed submission commenting on numerous design aspects of the scheme.
Attachments
Grant Donohue
Object
WATERLOO , New South Wales
Message
Project ruins the character of Waterloo & also to rip up heavy rail system is illogical .
Lorraine Byrnes
Object
WATERLOO , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Comment
Waterloo , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
REDWatch Inc
Object
REDFERN , New South Wales
Message
The REDWatch submission is attached
Attachments
Department of Transport
Comment
Chippendale , New South Wales
Message
A copy of the TfNSW response letter is attached.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
WATERLOO , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
City of Sydney
Object
SYDNEY , New South Wales
Message
Dear Russell

Please find attached the City's consolidated response to the Waterloo OSD SSD applications.

Regards
David Zabell
Attachments
Sydney Metro Corridor Protection
Comment
SYDNEY , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Sydney Water
Comment
PARRAMATTA , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Inner Sydney Voice
Object
WATERLOO , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
NSW Health - SLHD
Comment
Camperdown , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Comment
Phillip , Australian Capital Territory
Message
Attachments
Sydney Airport Corporation
Comment
Canberra , Australian Capital Territory
Message
Attachments

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
SSD-10441
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Residential & Commercial
Local Government Areas
City of Sydney
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider
Director

Contact Planner

Name
Russell Hand