State Significant Development
Determination
Amending Concept DA - Waterloo Metro Quarter OSD
City of Sydney
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Changes to the approved building envelope and use at the Northern Precinct to enable the development of a commercial office building on the site.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Showing 1 - 20 of 20 submissions
Biodiversity and Conservation Division
Comment
Biodiversity and Conservation Division
Comment
PARRAMATTA
,
New South Wales
Message
Please find attached EES response
Attachments
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Comment
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Comment
Sydney
,
New South Wales
Message
Based on the information provided, the proposal does not constitute a Scheduled Activity under Schedule 1 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO Act). At this stage, the EPA does not consider that the proposal will require an Environment Protection Licence (EPL) under the POEO Act.
As an advisory note, the development will be located in the vicinity of tunnels containing operational rail lines, for which the EPA has a regulatory responsibility. The consent should include acceptable vibration and ground borne noise limits for spaces within the development drawn from the EPA’s Rail Infrastructure Noise Guideline (EPA, 2013) and Assessing Vibration: A Technical Guideline (DECC, 2006).
As the applicant is a private developer and not a NSW public authority, the EPA would not be the appropriate regulatory authority under the POEO Act for the environmental performance of the OSD project.
The EPA has no comment on EIS.
As an advisory note, the development will be located in the vicinity of tunnels containing operational rail lines, for which the EPA has a regulatory responsibility. The consent should include acceptable vibration and ground borne noise limits for spaces within the development drawn from the EPA’s Rail Infrastructure Noise Guideline (EPA, 2013) and Assessing Vibration: A Technical Guideline (DECC, 2006).
As the applicant is a private developer and not a NSW public authority, the EPA would not be the appropriate regulatory authority under the POEO Act for the environmental performance of the OSD project.
The EPA has no comment on EIS.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Support
ALEXANDRIA
,
New South Wales
Message
The reduction in height of the building will look much better!
John Hackett
Comment
John Hackett
Comment
Alexandria
,
New South Wales
Message
I live very close to this project and while I am happy for such a project to go ahead I am very concerned about the size of it and the extra traffic it may cause. The car access to my building is via Botany Lane and the one way section of Buckland st. This is slow enough with the amount of traffic now and I fear this will become even slower with an increase. I am also concerned about the potential loss of sunlight to my apartment in the afternoon, particularly in winter when it's most needed.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
ALEXANDRIA
,
New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Counterpoint Community Services Inc
Comment
Counterpoint Community Services Inc
Comment
Andrew Andersons
Comment
Andrew Andersons
Comment
PADDINGTON
,
New South Wales
Message
Please find attached a detailed submission commenting on numerous design aspects of the scheme.
Attachments
Grant Donohue
Object
Grant Donohue
Object
WATERLOO
,
New South Wales
Message
Project ruins the character of Waterloo & also to rip up heavy rail system is illogical .
Lorraine Byrnes
Object
Lorraine Byrnes
Object
WATERLOO
,
New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Comment
Name Withheld
Comment
REDWatch Inc
Object
REDWatch Inc
Object
REDFERN
,
New South Wales
Message
The REDWatch submission is attached
Attachments
Department of Transport
Comment
Department of Transport
Comment
Chippendale
,
New South Wales
Message
A copy of the TfNSW response letter is attached.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
City of Sydney
Object
City of Sydney
Object
SYDNEY
,
New South Wales
Message
Dear Russell
Please find attached the City's consolidated response to the Waterloo OSD SSD applications.
Regards
David Zabell
Please find attached the City's consolidated response to the Waterloo OSD SSD applications.
Regards
David Zabell
Attachments
Sydney Metro Corridor Protection
Comment
Sydney Metro Corridor Protection
Comment
Sydney Water
Comment
Sydney Water
Comment
Inner Sydney Voice
Object
Inner Sydney Voice
Object
WATERLOO
,
New South Wales
Message
Attachments
NSW Health - SLHD
Comment
NSW Health - SLHD
Comment
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Comment
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Comment
Sydney Airport Corporation
Comment
Sydney Airport Corporation
Comment
Pagination
Project Details
Application Number
SSD-10441
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Residential & Commercial
Local Government Areas
City of Sydney
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider